Re: Removing unneeded self joins
Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Remove GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE from enable_self_join_elimination
- 717d0e8dd945 18.0 landed
-
Put enable_self_join_elimination into postgresql.conf.sample
- c2d329260cd8 18.0 landed
-
Get rid of ojrelid local variable in remove_rel_from_query()
- e167191dc146 18.0 landed
-
Implement Self-Join Elimination
- fc069a3a6319 18.0 cited
-
Revert: Remove useless self-joins
- d1d286d83c0e 17.0 landed
-
Replace lateral references to removed rels in subqueries
- 466979ef031a 17.0 landed
-
Replace relids in lateral subquery parse tree during SJE
- 489072ab7a9e 17.0 landed
-
Forbid SJE with result relation
- 8c441c082797 17.0 landed
-
Fix misuse of RelOptInfo.unique_for_rels cache by SJE
- 30b4955a4668 17.0 landed
-
Replace the relid in some missing fields during SJE
- a7928a57b9f0 17.0 landed
-
Revert 56-bit relfilenode change and follow-up commits.
- a448e49bcbe4 16.0 cited
-
Stabilize timetz test across DST transitions.
- 4a071afbd056 14.0 cited
-
Speed up finding EquivalenceClasses for a given set of rels
- 3373c7155350 13.0 cited
-
Fix mark-and-restore-skipping test case to not be a self-join.
- 24d08f3c0a1f 12.0 landed
Attachments
- v4-0002-Apply-SJE-to-DML-queries-2.patch (text/x-patch) patch v4-0002
On 7/11/24 14:43, jian he wrote: > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 2:06 PM Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 7/2/24 07:25, jian he wrote: >>> to make sure it's correct, I have added a lot of tests, >>> Some of this may be contrived, maybe some of the tests are redundant. >> Thanks for your job! >> I passed through the patches and have some notes: >> 1. Patch 0001 has not been applied anymore since the previous week's >> changes in the core. Also, there is one place with trailing whitespace. > > thanks. > because the previous thread mentioned the EPQ problem. > in remove_useless_self_joins, i make it can only process CMD_SELECT query. I would like to oppose here: IMO, it is just a mishap which we made because of a long history of patch transformations. There we lost the case where RowMark exists for only one of candidate relations. Also, after review I think we don't need so many new tests. Specifically for DML we already have one: EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) UPDATE sj sq SET b = 1 FROM sj as sz WHERE sq.a = sz.a; And we should just add something to elaborate it a bit. See the patch in attachment containing my proposal to improve v4-0001 main SJE patch. I think it resolved the issue with EPQ assertion as well as problems with returning value. -- regards, Andrei Lepikhov