Re: Extension Packaging
David Wheeler <david@kineticode.com>
From: "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-04-24T22:21:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Apr 24, 2011, at 3:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Yeah. It seems like a bad idea if the distribution "name" doesn't > include sufficient information to tell which version it contains. > I had in mind a convention like "distribution version x.y.z always > contains extension version x.y". Seems like minor version versus > major version would be the way to explain that. Does that apply to PostgreSQL itself? I guess release 9.0.4 contains 9.0. But it's a convention. David