Re: Extension Packaging

David Wheeler <david@kineticode.com>

From: "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-04-24T22:21:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Apr 24, 2011, at 3:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Yeah.  It seems like a bad idea if the distribution "name" doesn't
> include sufficient information to tell which version it contains.
> I had in mind a convention like "distribution version x.y.z always
> contains extension version x.y".  Seems like minor version versus
> major version would be the way to explain that.

Does that apply to PostgreSQL itself? I guess release 9.0.4 contains 9.0. But it's a convention.

David