Is this a typo?
Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
From: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
To: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-11-11T03:32:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi Hacker,
While working on the other patch and editing heapam.c, I noticed this in line 2251:
```
/*
* If tuple is cachable, mark it for invalidation from the caches in case
* we abort. Note it is OK to do this after releasing the buffer, because
* the heaptup data structure is all in local memory, not in the shared
* buffer.
*/
```
Is “cachable” a typo? I confirmed with a dictionary and it gave me “cacheable”. Maybe an acceptable old usage that I am not aware of? So, I want to confirm with the community.
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
Commits
-
Prefer spelling "cacheable" over "cachable".
- 2421ade663e9 19 (unreleased) landed