Re: Weird test mixup

x4mmm@yandex-team.ru

From: "Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-05-02T08:52:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 2 May 2024, at 13:43, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> 
> A detach is not a wakeup.

Oh, now I see. Sorry for the noise.

Detaching local injection point of other backend seems to be useless and can be forbidden.
As far as I understand, your patch is already doing this in
+	if (!injection_point_allowed(name))
+		elog(ERROR, "cannot detach injection point \"%s\" not allowed to run",
+			 name);
+

As far as I understand this will effectively forbid calling injection_points_detach() for local injection point of other backend. Do I get it right?


Best regards, Andrey Borodin.


Commits

  1. injection_points: Store runtime conditions in private area

  2. Introduce private data area for injection points

  3. injection_points: Fix incorrect spinlock acquisition

  4. Make GIN tests using injection points concurrent-safe

  5. injection_points: Fix race condition with local injection point tests

  6. injection_points: Introduce runtime conditions

  7. Make GIN test using injection points repeatable

  8. Fix backstop in gin test if injection point is not reached

  9. Try to unbreak injection-fault tests in the buildfarm

  10. Disable tests using injection points in installcheck