Re: BUG #15552: Unexpected error in COPY to a foreign table in a transaction
Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
Luis Carril <luis.carril@swarm64.com>,
"pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>,
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>,
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Date: 2018-12-19T07:50:55Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
(2018/12/19 13:04), Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 01:01:01PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: >> It may happen sooner that you may think. :) >> >> Currently, COPY into foreign tables uses APIs used by INSERT, so one row >> at a time interface. It'd certainly be better to allow FDWs to be able to >> do bulk transfer. I think Fujita-san has said he wants to work on that: >> >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5AB4F190.1000804%40lab.ntt.co.jp > > That's interesting. Thanks! Actually, I (re-)started working on that from this week. (Not sure whether I can post a patch for that before the next CF.) Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
Commits
-
Disable WAL-skipping optimization for COPY on views
- 15f69279e0e8 10.7 landed
-
Disable WAL-skipping optimization for COPY on views and foreign tables
- ff9c22266906 11.2 landed
- bf491a9073e1 12.0 landed