Horton

Re: The two "XML Fixes" patches still in need of review

Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Markus Winand <markus.winand@winand.at>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Date: 2019-03-24T01:21:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On 03/23/19 18:20, Chapman Flack wrote:
> On 03/23/19 17:05, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I've now pushed a somewhat-adjusted version of the XML-content fix
>> patch.  The documentation patch needs some small rebasing to apply
>> after that one instead of before it.
> 
> Will do.
> 
>> Perhaps it'd make sense under the XML section in datatype.sgml,
>> but I think I might lean to making it a new section in Appendix D
>> (SQL Conformance).
> 
> Sounds like the option (4) I proposed back in [1]. I suppose it won't
> be much trouble to move.

PFA xml-functions-type-docfix-4.patch rebased, and with the limits/
compatibility section moved to Appendix D.

Regards,
-Chap

Commits

  1. Improve documentation about our XML functionality

  2. Improve documentation about our XML functionality.