Re: [HACKERS] Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issues for foreign tables
Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>,
Ildus Kurbangaliev <i.kurbangaliev@postgrespro.ru>,
Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Date: 2017-11-27T05:38:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
(2017/11/27 7:56), Tom Lane wrote: > Etsuro Fujita<fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes: >> [ fix-rewrite-tlist-v4.patch ] > > I started reviewing this patch. Great! > I did not much like the fact that it > effectively moved rewriteTargetListUD to a different file and renamed it. > That seems like unnecessary code churn, plus it breaks the analogy with > rewriteTargetListIU, plus it will make back-patching harder (since that > code isn't exactly the same in back branches). I see little reason why > we can't leave it where it is and just make it non-static. It's not like > there's no other parts of the rewriter that the planner calls. Agreed. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
Commits
-
Fix creation of resjunk tlist entries for inherited mixed UPDATE/DELETE.
- 39f180fdd1e6 9.5.11 landed
- 06ba5309682e 9.6.7 landed
- a57aa430b613 10.2 landed
- 9a785ad57317 11.0 landed