Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Aggregation push-down
Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>
From: Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>
To: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2018-01-29T14:01:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 01/29/18 03:32, Antonin Houska wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>> only take place if we had a special equality operator which distinguishes the >>> *binary* values (I don't know yet how to store this operator the catalog --- ... >> We don't have an operator that tests for binary equality, but it's >> certainly testable from C; see datumIsEqual. Disclaimer: I haven't been following the whole thread closely. But could there be some way to exploit the composite-type *= operator? https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-comparisons.html#COMPOSITE-TYPE-COMPARISON -Chap
Commits
-
Move estimate_hashagg_tablesize to selfuncs.c, and widen result to double.
- 0c7d53793079 12.0 landed
-
Remove unnecessairly duplicated gram.y productions
- b9a3ef55b253 10.0 cited