Re: SQL:2011 application time
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Rename gist stratnum support function
- 32edf732e8dc 18.0 landed
-
Remove support for temporal RESTRICT foreign keys
- b83e8a2ca2eb 18.0 landed
-
Cache NO ACTION foreign keys separately from RESTRICT foreign keys
- 9926f854d077 18.0 landed
-
Fix NO ACTION temporal foreign keys when the referenced endpoints change
- 1772d554b089 18.0 landed
-
Improve whitespace in without_overlaps test
- 888d4523f0c2 18.0 landed
-
Tests for logical replication with temporal keys
- 939b0908c87a 18.0 landed
-
Support for GiST in get_equal_strategy_number()
- 74edabce7a33 18.0 landed
-
Make the conditions in IsIndexUsableForReplicaIdentityFull() more explicit
- 13544e790ef8 18.0 landed
-
Replace get_equal_strategy_number_for_am() by get_equal_strategy_number()
- a2a475b011cf 18.0 landed
-
Improve internal logical replication error for missing equality strategy
- 321c287351f7 18.0 landed
-
Simplify IsIndexUsableForReplicaIdentityFull()
- 7727049e8f66 18.0 landed
-
Fix ALTER TABLE / REPLICA IDENTITY for temporal tables
- 79b575d3bc09 18.0 landed
-
doc: Update pg_constraint.conexclop docs for WITHOUT OVERLAPS
- f683ba0867da 18.0 landed
-
doc: Add PERIOD to ALTER TABLE reference docs
- d56af4c882e2 18.0 landed
-
doc: Add WITHOUT OVERLAPS to ALTER TABLE reference docs
- bf621059500b 18.0 landed
-
Add temporal FOREIGN KEY contraints
- 89f908a6d0ac 18.0 landed
- 34768ee36165 17.0 landed
-
Add temporal PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints
- fc0438b4e805 18.0 landed
- 46a0cd4cefb4 17.0 landed
-
Add stratnum GiST support function
- 7406ab623fee 18.0 landed
- 6db4598fcb82 17.0 landed
-
Avoid crashing when a JIT-inlined backend function throws an error.
- 5d6c64d29097 17.0 cited
-
Revert temporal primary keys and foreign keys
- 8aee330af55d 17.0 landed
-
Fix ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING/UPDATE for temporal indexes
- 144c2ce0cc75 17.0 landed
-
Add test for REPLICA IDENTITY with a temporal key
- 482e108cd38d 17.0 landed
-
Use half-open interval notation in without_overlaps tests
- 5577a71fb0cc 17.0 landed
-
Use daterange and YMD in without_overlaps tests instead of tsrange.
- a88c800deb6f 17.0 landed
-
Rename pg_constraint.conwithoutoverlaps to conperiod
- 030e10ff1a36 17.0 landed
-
Fix comment on gist_stratnum_btree
- 86232a49a437 17.0 landed
-
Add missing TAP test name
- 1ab763fc22ad 16.0 cited
-
Improve error handling of HMAC computations
- 5513dc6a304d 15.0 cited
-
Rename functions to avoid future conflicts
- ee419607381d 15.0 landed
I committed a few fixes in this area today. Has everything here been
addressed?
On 16.08.24 04:12, jian he wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 4:54 AM Paul Jungwirth
> <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com> wrote:
>>
>> Rebased to e56ccc8e42.
>
> I only applied to 0001-0003.
> in create_table.sgml, I saw the WITHOUT OVERLAPS change is mainly in
> table_constraint.
> but we didn't touch alter_table.sgml.
> Do we also need to change alter_table.sgml correspondingly?
>
>
> + if (constraint->without_overlaps)
> + {
> + /*
> + * This enforces that there is at least one equality column
> + * besides the WITHOUT OVERLAPS columns. This is per SQL
> + * standard. XXX Do we need this?
> + */
> + if (list_length(constraint->keys) < 2)
> + ereport(ERROR,
> + errcode(ERRCODE_SYNTAX_ERROR),
> + errmsg("constraint using WITHOUT OVERLAPS needs at least two columns"));
> +
> + /* WITHOUT OVERLAPS requires a GiST index */
> + index->accessMethod = "gist";
> + }
> if Constraint->conname is not NULL, we can
> + errmsg("constraint \"%s\" using WITHOUT OVERLAPS needs at least two
> columns"));
>
> "XXX Do we need this?"
> I think currently we need this, otherwise the following create_table
> synopsis will not be correct.
> UNIQUE [ NULLS [ NOT ] DISTINCT ] ( column_name [, ... ] [,
> column_name WITHOUT OVERLAPS ] )
> PRIMARY KEY ( column_name [, ... ] [, column_name WITHOUT OVERLAPS ] )
>
>
> we add a column in catalog-pg-constraint.
> do we need change column conexclop,
> "If an exclusion constraint, list of the per-column exclusion operators"
> but currently, primary key, unique constraint both have valid conexclop.
>
>
> +static void
> +ExecWithoutOverlapsNotEmpty(Relation rel, NameData attname, Datum
> attval, char typtype, Oid atttypid)
> +{
> + bool isempty;
> + RangeType *r;
> + MultirangeType *mr;
> +
> + switch (typtype)
> + {
> + case TYPTYPE_RANGE:
> + r = DatumGetRangeTypeP(attval);
> + isempty = RangeIsEmpty(r);
> + break;
> + case TYPTYPE_MULTIRANGE:
> + mr = DatumGetMultirangeTypeP(attval);
> + isempty = MultirangeIsEmpty(mr);
> + break;
> + default:
> + elog(ERROR, "WITHOUT OVERLAPS column \"%s\" is not a range or multirange",
> + NameStr(attname));
> + }
> +
> + /* Report a CHECK_VIOLATION */
> + if (isempty)
> + ereport(ERROR,
> + (errcode(ERRCODE_CHECK_VIOLATION),
> + errmsg("empty WITHOUT OVERLAPS value found in column \"%s\" in
> relation \"%s\"",
> + NameStr(attname), RelationGetRelationName(rel))));
> +}
> I think in the default branch, you need at least set the isempty
> value, otherwise maybe there will be a compiler warning
> because later your use isempty, but via default branch is value undefined?
>
>
> + /*
> + * If this is a WITHOUT OVERLAPS constraint,
> + * we must also forbid empty ranges/multiranges.
> + * This must happen before we look for NULLs below,
> + * or a UNIQUE constraint could insert an empty
> + * range along with a NULL scalar part.
> + */
> + if (indexInfo->ii_WithoutOverlaps)
> + {
> + ExecWithoutOverlapsNotEmpty(heap, att->attname,
> + }
> previously we found out that if this happens later, then it won't work.
> but this comment didn't explain why this must have happened earlier.
> I didn't dig deep enough to find out why.
> but explaining it would be very helpful.
>
>
> I think some tests are duplicated, so I did the refactoring.