Horton

Re: Remove non-fast promotion Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2

Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
To: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, ian.barwick@2ndquadrant.com, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, michael@paquier.xyz, andres@anarazel.de, robertmhaas@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, cyberdemn@gmail.com
Date: 2020-04-23T02:34:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 

On 2020/04/23 3:56, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 11:51:15 +0900
> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2020/04/22 10:53, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
>>   [...]
>>   [...]
>>   [...]
>>   [...]
>>   [...]
>>   [...]
>>   [...]
>>   [...]
>>   [...]
>>   [...]
>>   [...]
>>
>> Thanks all for checking whether the change affects each HA solution!
> 
> Unless I'm wrong, we don't have feedback from Patroni team.
> 
> I did some quick grep and it seems to rely on "pg_ctl promote" as well.
> Moreover, the latest commit 80fbe9005 force a checkpoint right after the
> promote. So I suppose they don't use non-fast promote.

Thanks for checking that!

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

Commits

  1. Remove non-fast promotion.