Re: Improving isolationtester's data output
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2021-06-16T02:44:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- isolationtester-PQprint-output.patch (text/x-diff) patch
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > On 2021-Jun-15, Tom Lane wrote: >> If we wanted to buy into that, I'd think about discarding this >> ad-hoc code altogether in favor of using one of libpq's fe-print.c >> routines. But I'm not really sure that the small legibility gains >> that would result are worth massive changes in the output files. > Shrug -- it's a one time change. It wouldn't bother me, for one. Here's a really quick-and-dirty patch to see what that would look like. I haven't bothered here to update the expected-files outside the main src/test/isolation directory, nor to fix the variant files. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Improve display of query results in isolation tests.
- 4a054069a360 14.0 landed
- e535a8899397 9.6.23 landed
- d7da3ef08989 12.8 landed
- b961bdfe1664 13.4 landed
- b1aa0f228465 11.13 landed
- 0a8929ca0b9e 10.18 landed
-
Detect unused steps in isolation specs and do some cleanup
- 484c81bf7765 9.6.23 landed
- feac82fa8550 10.18 landed
- 8f32299424d9 11.13 landed
- 96f3661e4540 12.8 landed
- 989d23b04bea 13.0 cited
-
Remove dry-run mode from isolationtester
- b7cd5c5b02fa 9.6.23 landed
- 0ed218048932 10.18 landed
- 834cb7269166 11.13 landed
- a8f687927eea 12.8 landed
- 9903338b5ea5 13.0 cited