Re: Foreign keys for non-default datatypes
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, CG <cgg007@yahoo.com>
Date: 2006-03-03T21:11:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Andrew Dunstan wrote: >>> Speaking of parsers, did anyone else notice that gcc in its latest >>> release has ripped out the bison based parser for C and Objective-C in >>> favor of a hand cut RD parser? >> >> Yeah, I did. I wonder what sort of effort they went to write the new >> parser. > This is the new parser > http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/tags/gcc_4_1_0_release/gcc/c-parser.c?view=markup&rev=111560 > It's 6000 lines long. Given that we whack the grammar around on a pretty regular basis, I can't imagine that it'd be a smart idea to go to a handmade parser. gcc is dealing with a very stable language definition so the tradeoffs for them are a lot different. Be nice if bison were a tad faster though :-( regards, tom lane