Re: [PATCH] Revert default wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux 2.6.33+

Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Making it support O_DIRECT would be possible but more complex; I don't
> see the point unless we think we're going to have open_sync_with_odirect
> as a seperate option.

Whether it's complex or not isn't really the issue.  The issue is that
what test_fsync is testing had better match what the backend does, or
people will be making choices based on not-comparable test results.
I think we should have test_fsync just automatically fold in O_DIRECT
the same way the backend does.

			regards, tom lane