Re: -D option of pg_resetwal is only works with absolute path
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Cc: tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>,
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-05-23T15:35:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> writes: > On 5/23/18 10:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Seems to be caused by careless placement of new umask-changing code. >> I wonder how many other places that patch broke similarly. > I'll look into this today. I pushed a patch already, although certainly an additional pair of eyes on the issue would be good. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Fix incorrect ordering of operations in pg_resetwal and pg_rewind.
- 1d96c1b91a4b 11.0 landed