Re: Complier warnings on mingw gcc 4.5.0
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>, Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-12-15T15:17:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Make the win32 putenv() override update *all* present versions of the
- 741e4ad7de9e 9.0.0 cited
-
Remove the use of the pg_auth flat file for client authentication.
- e710b65c1c56 9.0.0 cited
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of mi dic 15 02:08:24 -0300 2010: >> That didn't work. But git bisect says it's this commit that's to blame: >> <https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/e710b65c1c56ca7b91f662c63d37ff2e72862a94> > Hmm I wonder if this is reproducible in a non-Windows EXEC_BACKEND > scenario. I'm pretty sure I tried the no-flat-files code in that scenario while writing it. But it might be worth trying that again. You'd think though that if EXEC_BACKEND were sufficient to provoke it, all Windows builds would fail. I'm still mystified by what is the difference between Andrew's non-working installation and working mingw builds. regards, tom lane