Re: 10.0
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, David Fetter <david@fetter.org>,
Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
"pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-05-13T21:50:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 05/13/2016 05:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > An analogy that might get some traction among database geeks is that > version numbers are a sort of surrogate key, and assigning meaning to > surrogate keys is a bad idea. > > :-) I agree year-based numbers will cause us grief. I don't have any strong opinions about this. It's essentially a marketing decision, and I'm happy to leave that to others. If and when we do change, I'd like to put in a modest request that we add an extra _ to the branch names, like this: REL_10_0_STABLE. That would mean they would sort nicely, which would make my life simpler in a few places in the buildfarm code. If not, I'd like a little advance notice so I can check all the places where we compare branch names. cheers andrew