Re: 10.0

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-05-13T21:50:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/13/2016 05:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> An analogy that might get some traction among database geeks is that
> version numbers are a sort of surrogate key, and assigning meaning to
> surrogate keys is a bad idea.
>
> 			

:-)

I agree year-based numbers will cause us grief.

I don't have any strong opinions about this. It's essentially a 
marketing decision, and I'm happy to leave that to others. If and when 
we do change, I'd like to put in a modest request that we add an extra _ 
to the branch names, like this: REL_10_0_STABLE. That would mean they 
would sort nicely, which would make my life simpler in a few places in 
the buildfarm code. If not, I'd like a little advance notice so I can 
check all the places where we compare branch names.

cheers

andrew