Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0

Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>

From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com>, Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-04-29T18:50:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 04/29/2016 11:36 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:

>     Egos.
>
>     Consider PgLogical, who is working on this outside of 2Q?
>
>
> Thank you for volunteering to assist. What would you like to work on?

You are very welcome. I have been testing as you know. I would be happy 
to continue that and also was going to look into having a subscriber 
validate if it is connecting to a subscribed node or not which is the 
error I ran into.

I am also interested in creating user docs (versus reference docs).

Sincerely,

JD



-- 
Command Prompt, Inc.                  http://the.postgres.company/
                         +1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.