Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0
Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com>,
Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-04-29T18:50:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 04/29/2016 11:36 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Egos.
>
> Consider PgLogical, who is working on this outside of 2Q?
>
>
> Thank you for volunteering to assist. What would you like to work on?
You are very welcome. I have been testing as you know. I would be happy
to continue that and also was going to look into having a subscriber
validate if it is connecting to a subscribed node or not which is the
error I ran into.
I am also interested in creating user docs (versus reference docs).
Sincerely,
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.