Horton

Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>
Cc: Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>
Date: 2012-04-06T16:38:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> In
>> particular I do not like the specific way it's done in the v7 patch
>> (I've not looked at v8 yet) because the interposed logic has a
>> hard-wired assumption that foreign tables do not have inheritance
>> children. I think that assumption has a life expectancy measured in
>> months at most, and I don't want to have to try to fix every FDW when
>> it changes. But I think we can easily revise the hook details to fix
>> that, and I'm hoping to get that done today.

> I'll try implementing the design you suggested.

I've already got it fixed up ...

			regards, tom lane