Horton
Menu

Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Cc: "Kumar, Sachin" <ssetiya@amazon.com>, Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-12-21T04:03:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
> Wow, thanks for putting together these patches.  I intend to help review,

Thanks!

> but I'm not sure I'll find much time to do so before the new year.

There's no urgency, surely.  If we can get these in during the
January CF, I'll be happy.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Count individual SQL commands in pg_restore's --transaction-size mode.

  2. Reduce number of commands dumpTableSchema emits for binary upgrade.

  3. Invent --transaction-size option for pg_restore.

  4. Rearrange pg_dump's handling of large objects for better efficiency.

  5. Add temporal PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints

  6. Fix typo and case in messages