Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
From: Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,
Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>,
David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>,
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Magnus Hagander
<magnus@hagander.net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-05-31T20:06:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 05/31/2016 01:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > The name should be closely related to what we use for #3. I could go for > max_total_parallel_workers for #2 and max_parallel_workers for #3. > Or maybe max_parallel_workers_total? How about parallel_worker_pool? -- -- Josh Berkus Red Hat OSAS (any opinions are my own)