Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?

Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>

From: Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-05-31T20:06:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 05/31/2016 01:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> The name should be closely related to what we use for #3.  I could go for
> max_total_parallel_workers for #2 and max_parallel_workers for #3.
> Or maybe max_parallel_workers_total?

How about parallel_worker_pool?

-- 
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)