Re: pgsql: Add test for postmaster crash restarts.

Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-09-30T22:21:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
[re-adding commiters which I inadvertently left off]


On 09/30/2017 06:10 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>
>
>> I was just looking at this. Why aren't we using "pg_ctl kill" to
>> terminate the backend? That's supposed to be portable.
> Because pg_ctl can't do that for any process but postmaster, no? The
> test is supposed to find issues with backend death (and has
> defficiencies in error reporting already, and would have caught a bug
> I'd introduced previously).
>


No, I don't think so. That's not what the docs say. That's why you give
it a pid argument" "pg_ctl kill signal_name process_id"

cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



Commits

  1. Allow pg_ctl kill to send SIGKILL.

  2. Try to make crash restart test work on windows.

  3. Make new crash restart test a bit more robust.

  4. Add test for postmaster crash restarts.