Re: btree_gin and btree_gist for enums
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Matt Wilmas <pgsql_lists@realplain.com>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-03-25T18:55:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 03/24/2016 12:40 PM, Matt Wilmas wrote: > (I notice the btree_gin docs don't mention "numeric," but it works.) > Numeric does work - we have regression tests to prove it, do we should fix the docs. But I'm also curious to know why apparently we don't have distance operator support for numeric. cheers andrew
Commits
-
Add btree_gin support for enum types
- 4ad0f88c443c 10.0 landed
-
Add btree_gist support for enum types.
- f7946a92b689 10.0 landed
-
Use CallerFInfoFunctionCall with btree_gist for numeric types
- 4b1c68d63e86 10.0 landed
-
Add a direct function call mechanism using the caller's context.
- 29bf5016835a 10.0 landed
-
Add support for EUI-64 MAC addresses as macaddr8
- c7a9fa399d55 10.0 cited
-
Add an Assert that enum_cmp_internal() gets passed an FmgrInfo pointer.
- 6d493e1a0135 10.0 landed