Re: pg_dump / copy bugs with "big lines" ?
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2016-03-02T15:30:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 03/02/2016 04:23 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On 03/02/2016 03:18 PM, Daniel Verite wrote:
>>> However, getting it to the client with \copy big2 to 'file'
>>> still produces the error in psql:
>>> lost synchronization with server: got message type "d"
>>> and leaves an empty file, so there are more problems to solve to
>>> go beyond 2GB text per row.
>
>> My guess is this is a problem at the protocol level - the 'd' message is
>> CopyData, and all the messages use int32 to define length. So if there's
>> a 2GB row, it's likely to overflow.
>
> I'm too lazy to check the exact wording, but I don't think there's a hard
> and fast promise in the protocol doc that one CopyData message == one row.
> So we could probably subdivide a very wide line into multiple messages.
Well, actually we claim this [1]:
Data that forms part of a COPY data stream. Messages sent from the
backend will always correspond to single data rows, but messages
sent by frontends might divide the data stream arbitrarily.
So that suggests 1:1 messages to rows, although I'm not sure how
difficult would it be to relax this (or how much the clients might rely
on this).
[1] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/protocol-message-formats.html
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Fix overflow check in StringInfo; add missing casts
- 42f50cb8fa98 10.0 landed
-
Permit dump/reload of not-too-large >1GB tuples
- fa2fa9955280 10.0 landed
- 646655d264f1 9.5.6 landed
- 4e01ecae9827 9.6.2 landed