Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.

Amir Rohan <amir.rohan@zoho.com>

From: Amir Rohan <amir.rohan@zoho.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Date: 2015-10-11T10:31:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 10/11/2015 01:19 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Amir Rohan wrote:
>> On 10/11/2015 02:47 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I apologize -- that didn't came out right.
>> What I meant to suggest was "open an issue" to track
>> any works that needs to be done. But I guess that's
>> not the PG way.
> 
> No problem. I was not clear either. We could create a new item in the
> TODO list (https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo) and link it to
> dedicated page on the wiki where all the potential tests would be
> listed.
> 

It couldn't hurt but also may be just a waste of your time.
I'm just realizing how central an issue tracker is to how I work and
how much not having one irritates me. Tough luck for me I guess.

Regards,
Amir



Commits

  1. Add a test framework for recovery

  2. Refactor Perl test code

  3. pgindent run for 9.5