Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.
Amir Rohan <amir.rohan@zoho.com>
From: Amir Rohan <amir.rohan@zoho.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>,
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>,
PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Date: 2015-10-11T07:44:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 10/11/2015 02:47 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Amir Rohan <amir.rohan@zoho.com> wrote: >> On 10/10/2015 04:32 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> I was arguing that it's an on-going task that would do >> better if it had a TODO list, instead of "ideas for tests" >> being scattered across 50-100 messages spanning a year or >> more in one thread or another. You may disagree. > > Let's be clear. I am fully in line with your point. > I apologize -- that didn't came out right. What I meant to suggest was "open an issue" to track any works that needs to be done. But I guess that's not the PG way. Amir
Commits
-
Add a test framework for recovery
- 49148645f7f3 9.6.0 landed
-
Refactor Perl test code
- 1caef31d9e55 9.6.0 cited
-
pgindent run for 9.5
- 807b9e0dff66 9.5.0 cited