Re: funcs.sgml - wrong example
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2022-06-01T14:41:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> writes:
> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 03:08:32AM +0200, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>> funcs.sgml has
>> 42 <@ '{[1,7)}'::int4multirange
>> and calls it true. The attached fixes that.
>>
>> Included are two more changes where actual output differs a bit from what
>> the doc examples show.
> This patch is RFC but seems to have been forgotten.
> Feel free to add it to the next CF if nobody applies it.
Pushed now. I modified that example to 4 <@ '{[1,7)}'::int4multirange
so that it would indeed return true, which is our usual style.
regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Doc: fix a couple of erroneous examples.
- 80cd99c55802 14.4 landed
- 1d0de97ba1e6 15.0 landed