Re: Sequence Access Method WIP
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2015-04-20T09:49:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 03/15/2015 09:07 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote: > Slightly updated version of the patch. > > Mainly rebased against current master (there were several conflicts) and > fixed some typos, no real functional change. > > I also attached initial version of the API sgml doc. Thanks! With the patch, pg_class.relam column references to the pg_seqam table for sequences, but pg_indexam for indexes. I believe it's the first instance where we reuse a "foreign key" column like that. It's not a real foreign key, of course - that wouldn't work with a real foreign key at all - but it's a bit strange. That makes me a bit uncomfortable. How do others feel about that? - Heikki
Commits
-
Add missing gss option to msvc config template
- 3063e7a84026 9.6.0 cited