Horton

Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes

Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-01-15T08:53:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 2020-12-08 10:38, vignesh C wrote:
> I have implemented printing of backtrace based on handling it in
> CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS. This patch also includes the change to allow
> getting backtrace of any particular process based on the suggestions.
> Attached patch has the implementation for the same.
> Thoughts?

Are we willing to use up a signal for this?

Commits

  1. Perform apply of large transactions by parallel workers.

  2. Enhance pg_log_backend_memory_contexts() for auxiliary processes.

  3. Allow GRANT on pg_log_backend_memory_contexts().

  4. Move Perl test modules to a better namespace

  5. Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods

  6. Add backtrace support for error reporting