Re: Support tab completion for upper character inputs in psql
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
To: "tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com" <tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com>,
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>,
Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Cc: "smithpb2250@gmail.com" <smithpb2250@gmail.com>,
"david.zhang@highgo.ca" <david.zhang@highgo.ca>,
"pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-01-06T07:46:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 10.09.21 15:50, tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com wrote: >> (A test case for the enum case should be doable easily.) > Test added. The enum test is failing on *some* platforms: t/010_tab_completion.pl .. 26/? # Failed test 'complete enum values' # at t/010_tab_completion.pl line 211. # Actual output was "ALTER TYPE mytype1 RENAME VALUE '\a\r\n'BLUE' 'bLACK' 'green' \r\npostgres=# ALTER TYPE mytype1 RENAME VALUE '" # Did not match "(?^:'bLACK' + 'BLUE' + 'green')" So the ordering of the suggested completions is different. I don't know offhand how that ordering is determined. Perhaps it's dependent on locale, readline version, or operating system. In any case, we need to figure this out to make this test stable.
Commits
-
Fix minor memory leaks in psql's tab completion.
- 90474c16a7d2 16.0 landed
- 00cf40328a31 15.0 landed
-
Further tweaks for psql's new tab-completion logic.
- f0cd9097cfac 15.0 landed
-
Treat case of tab-completion keywords a bit more carefully.
- 020258fbd30d 15.0 landed
-
psql: improve tab-complete's handling of variant SQL names.
- 02b8048ba5dc 15.0 landed
-
Make PQcancel use the PGconn's tcp_user_timeout and keepalives settings.
- 5987feb70b5b 15.0 cited
-
Use a WaitLatch for vacuum/autovacuum sleeping
- 4753ef37e0ed 14.0 cited