Re: Sequence Access Method WIP

Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2015-02-18T02:02:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 18/02/15 02:59, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 17/02/15 23:11, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>
>> wrote:
>>> sending new version that is updated along the lines of what we
>>> discussed at
>>> FOSDEM, which means:
>>>
>>> - back to single bytea amdata column (no custom columns)
>>
>
> Well, the main argument is still future possibility of moving into
> single table for storage. And when we discussed about it in person we
> agreed that there is not too big advantage in having separate columns
> since there need to be dump/restore state interfaces anyway so you can
> see the relevant state via those as we made the output more human
> readable (and the psql support reflects that).
>

Also makes the patch a little simpler obviously.

-- 
  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
  PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


Commits

  1. Add missing gss option to msvc config template