Re: Sequence Access Method WIP
Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>,
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>,
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2015-02-18T02:02:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 18/02/15 02:59, Petr Jelinek wrote: > On 17/02/15 23:11, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com> >> wrote: >>> sending new version that is updated along the lines of what we >>> discussed at >>> FOSDEM, which means: >>> >>> - back to single bytea amdata column (no custom columns) >> > > Well, the main argument is still future possibility of moving into > single table for storage. And when we discussed about it in person we > agreed that there is not too big advantage in having separate columns > since there need to be dump/restore state interfaces anyway so you can > see the relevant state via those as we made the output more human > readable (and the psql support reflects that). > Also makes the patch a little simpler obviously. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Commits
-
Add missing gss option to msvc config template
- 3063e7a84026 9.6.0 cited