Re: Sequence Access Method WIP
Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>,
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>,
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2015-02-18T01:59:32Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 17/02/15 23:11, Robert Haas wrote: > On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> sending new version that is updated along the lines of what we discussed at >> FOSDEM, which means: >> >> - back to single bytea amdata column (no custom columns) > Well, the main argument is still future possibility of moving into single table for storage. And when we discussed about it in person we agreed that there is not too big advantage in having separate columns since there need to be dump/restore state interfaces anyway so you can see the relevant state via those as we made the output more human readable (and the psql support reflects that). -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Commits
-
Add missing gss option to msvc config template
- 3063e7a84026 9.6.0 cited