Re: Table description in the data file (Re: pg_rawdump)

Jim Nasby <jim.nasby@bluetreble.com>

From: Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
To: "Stephen R. van den Berg" <srb@cuci.nl>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>
Date: 2015-02-04T05:48:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2/3/15 1:43 AM, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
> In relation to the talk and discussions at FOSDEM regarding
> helping data recovery, I searched the archives for the
> old thread after I performed my last recovery; for reference:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20101019201223.GA15684@cuci.nl
>
> I haven't checked yet if the proposed space there is still
> available in the current disk format, but it might serve as
> a starter and reminder to get the discussion going once more.

Rather than trying to wedge this into a heap page, ISTM it'd be better 
to use a fork. Presumably if you're storing regular tuples that have the 
essential data from pg_class, pg_attribute (and maybe pg_type).
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com