Re: Table description in the data file (Re: pg_rawdump)
Jim Nasby <jim.nasby@bluetreble.com>
From: Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
To: "Stephen R. van den Berg" <srb@cuci.nl>, PostgreSQL mailing lists
<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>
Date: 2015-02-04T05:48:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2/3/15 1:43 AM, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote: > In relation to the talk and discussions at FOSDEM regarding > helping data recovery, I searched the archives for the > old thread after I performed my last recovery; for reference: > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20101019201223.GA15684@cuci.nl > > I haven't checked yet if the proposed space there is still > available in the current disk format, but it might serve as > a starter and reminder to get the discussion going once more. Rather than trying to wedge this into a heap page, ISTM it'd be better to use a fork. Presumably if you're storing regular tuples that have the essential data from pg_class, pg_attribute (and maybe pg_type). -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com