Re: NOT IN subquery optimization
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: "Li, Zheng" <zhelli@amazon.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
Richard Guo <riguo@pivotal.io>,
"Finnerty,
Jim" <jfinnert@amazon.com>
Date: 2019-03-02T00:45:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > I think you're fighting a losing battle here with adding OR quals to > the join condition. Yeah --- that has a nontrivial risk of making things significantly worse, which makes it a hard sell. I think the most reasonable bet here is simply to not perform the transformation if we can't prove the inner side NOT NULL. That's going to catch most of the useful cases anyway IMO. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Check we don't misoptimize a NOT IN where the subquery returns no rows.
- 3396138a6de3 12.0 landed