Re: Clarify VACUUM FULL exclusion in total_vacuum_time docs

On Tue, 2025-07-15 at 10:27 -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> On the other hand, reading the VACUUM reference page, I get the
> > feeling that the new syntax with parentheses should be favored.
> > After all, the old syntax doesn't support any of the recently
> > added options and restricts the option order.
> > 
> > So perhaps we should start propagating the parentheses more, and
> > the documentation is the perfect place to do that.
> 
> That might make sense, but how far we want to take it in the first go
> around seems like a discussion that is best put forth in a separate
> thread / patch.

Makes sense, and I have no objection to the patch as it is.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe