Re: setting per-database/role parameters checks them against wrong context
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Selena Deckelmann <selena@chesnok.com>,
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2013-01-25T20:35:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: >> diff --git a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c >> index 6b202e0..0677059 100644 >> --- a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c >> +++ b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c >> @@ -5150,7 +5150,7 @@ set_config_option(const char *name, const char *value, >> elevel = IsUnderPostmaster ? DEBUG3 : LOG; >> } >> else if (source == PGC_S_DATABASE || source == PGC_S_USER || >> - source == PGC_S_DATABASE_USER) >> + source == PGC_S_DATABASE_USER || source == PG_S_SESSION) >> elevel = WARNING; >> else >> elevel = ERROR; > Is there any opinion on whether we need this patch? It basically allows > SET from a session to issue a warning rather than an error. Surely this is a completely horrid idea. It doesn't "allow" SET to throw a warning, it changes all interactive-SET cases from ERROR to WARNING. That's a whole lot of collateral damage to fix a very narrow case that's not even there anymore. regards, tom lane