Re: Sequence Access Method WIP
Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>,
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2014-11-10T00:39:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 09/11/14 20:47, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 11/08/2014 01:57 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote: >> My main problem is actually not with having tuple per-seqAM, but more >> with the fact that Heikki does not want to have last_value as compulsory >> column/parameter. How is the new AM then supposed to know where to pick >> up and if it even can pick up? > > Call nextval(), and use the value it returns as the starting point for > the new AM. > Hah, so simple, works for me. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Commits
-
Add missing gss option to msvc config template
- 3063e7a84026 9.6.0 cited