Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions

Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>

From: Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>

To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>

Cc: yasuo.honda@gmail.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, smithpb2250@gmail.com, vignesh21@gmail.com, michael@paquier.xyz, nathandbossart@gmail.com, stark.cfm@gmail.com, geidav.pg@gmail.com, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, marcos@f10.com.br, robertmhaas@gmail.com, david@pgmasters.net, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pavel.trukhanov@gmail.com, Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>

Date: 2024-08-11T16:54:05Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Introduce squashing of constant lists in query jumbling
- 62d712ecfd94 18.0 landed
Make documentation builds reproducible
- b0f0a9432d0b 17.0 cited
Include values of A_Const nodes in query jumbling
- 9ba37b2cb6a1 16.0 cited
Teach planner about more monotonic window functions
- 456fa635a909 16.0 cited
Split up guc.c for better build speed and ease of maintenance.
- 0a20ff54f5e6 16.0 cited

Hello

This feature will improve my monitoring. Even in patch 0001. I think there are many other people in the thread who think this is useful. So maybe we should move it forward? Any complaints about the overall design? I see in the discussion it was mentioned that it would be good to measure performance difference.

PS: patch cannot be applied at this time, it needs another rebase.

regards, Sergei