Re: disk backups
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@cupid.suninternet.com>
Cc: "Stephen Lawrence Jr." <logart@mail.com>, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Date: 2000-06-29T15:03:11Z
Lists: pgsql-general
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@cupid.suninternet.com> writes: > Is there a better way? Here pg_dumping the DB takes over half an hour > (mainly because pg_dump chews all available memory). pg_dump shouldn't be a performance hog if you are using the default COPY-based style of data export. I'd only expect memory problems if you are using INSERT-based export (-d or -D switch to pg_dump). For now, the answer is "don't do that" ... at least not on big tables. This could be fixed in either of two ways: 1. recode pg_dump to use DECLARE CURSOR and FETCH to grab table contents in reasonable-size chunks (instead of with an all-at-once SELECT); 2. add an API to libpq that allows a select result to be retrieved on-the-fly rather than accumulating it in libpq's memory. The second is more work but would be more widely useful. However, it's not been much of a priority, since insert-based data export is so slow to reload that no sensible person uses it for big tables anyway ;-) regards, tom lane