Re: proof concept: do statement parametrization

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, "Florian Pflug" <fgp@phlo.org>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-07-04T14:28:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, July 4, 2010 9:58 am, Tom Lane wrote:

>
> BTW, we intentionally didn't put any provision for parameters into DO
> originally.  What's changed to alter that decision?
>

Nothing that I know of, I think there is just a little impatience here. I
think the consensus was that we needed to get some experience of DO in the
field before looking at a parameter  mechanism. I still think that's the
correct position.

cheers

andrew