Horton

Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD

Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>

View thread
From: Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>, sfrost@snowman.net, girgen@freebsd.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, robertmhaas@gmail.com, ftigeot@wolfpond.org, Tom Sparks <tgs@norse-corp.com>
Date: 2014-04-26T19:32:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Add shared_memory_type GUC.

On 4/22/14, 5:01 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> Hey folks, I just spoke with our director of netops Tom Sparks here at Norse and we have a vested interest in Postgresql.  We can throw together a cluster of 4 machines with specs approximately in the range of dual quad core westmere with ~64GB of ram running FreeBSD 10 or 11. We can also do an Ubungu install as well or other Linux distro.  Please let me know if that this would be a something that the project could make use of please.
>
> We also have colo space and power, etc.  So this would be the whole deal.  The cluster would be up for as long as needed.
>
> Are the machine specs sufficient?  Any other things we should look for?
>
> CC'd Tom on this email.

Did anyone respond to this off-list?

Would these machines be more useful as dedicated performance test servers for the community or generic BenchFarm members?
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect                       jim@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell)                         http://jim.nasby.net