Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
From: Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
To: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>,
Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>,
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2014-04-22T06:26:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add shared_memory_type GUC.
- f1bebef60ec8 12.0 landed
On 22/04/14 09:25, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2014-04-21 17:21:20 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 02:08:51PM -0700, Joshua Drake wrote: >>> If the community had more *BSD presence I think it would be great >>> but it isn't all that viable at this point. I do know however that >>> no-one in this community would turn down a team of FreeBSD advocates >>> helping us make PostgreSQL awesome for PostgreSQL. >> >> I don't think we would even implement a run-time control for Linux or >> Windows for this, so I don't even think it is a FreeBSD issue. > > I think some of the arguments in this thread are pretty damn absurd. We > have just introduced dynamic_shared_memory_type. > +1 I was just thinking the same thing...