Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>, girgen@FreeBSD.org,
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, robertmhaas@gmail.com, ftigeot@wolfpond.org
Date: 2014-04-22T01:06:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add shared_memory_type GUC.
- f1bebef60ec8 12.0 landed
On 04/21/2014 08:49 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Tatsuo Ishii (ishii@postgresql.org) wrote: >> I observe performance degradation with PostgreSQL 9.3 vs 9.2 on Linux >> as well. The hardware is HP DL980G7, 80 cores, 2TB mem, RHEL 6, >> pgbench is used (read only query), scale factor is 1,000 (DB size >> 15GB). > Can you isolate the sysv-vs-mmap patch and see what happens with just > that change..? This is exactly why we need a benchfarm. I actually have a client working based on Greg Smith's pgbench tools. What we would need is a way to graph the results - that's something beyond my very rudimentary expertise in web programming. If anyone feels like collaborating I'd be glad to hear from them (The web site is programmed in perl + TemplateToolkit, but even that's not immutable. I'm open to using, say, node.js plus one of its templating engines. cheers andrew