Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
From: Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>,
Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>,
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2014-04-21T22:08:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add shared_memory_type GUC.
- f1bebef60ec8 12.0 landed
On 4/21/14, 4:08 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > If the community had more *BSD presence I think it would be great but it isn't all that viable at this point. I do know however that no-one in this community would turn down a team of FreeBSD advocates helping us make PostgreSQL awesome for PostgreSQL. I assume you meant FreeBSD awesome for PostgreSQL? :) I'm also a big fan of *BSD but the reality is it's MUCH harder to get *BSD into a corporation than linux. Now, if FreeBSD had a bunch of stuff that made PostgreSQL run like 4x faster on *BSD than Linux that would be a different story. -- Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect jim@nasby.net 512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net