Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD

Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>

From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
To: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2014-04-21T17:39:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Add shared_memory_type GUC.

On 4/21/14, 9:51 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-04-21 09:42:06 -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>> Sure, to be fair, we are under the gun here for a product, it may just mean
>> that the end result of that conversation is "mysql".
> Personally arguments in that vain are removing just about any incentive
> I have to work on the problem.

I was just explaining that we have a timeline over here and while that 
may disincentive you for providing what we need it would be very unfair.

In that I mean sometimes the reality of a situation can be inconvenient 
and for that I do apologize.

What I am seeing here is unfortunately a very strong departure from 
FreeBSD support by the community from several of the developers.  In 
fact over drinks at pgcon last year there were a TON of jokes making fun 
of FreeBSD users and developers which I took in stride as professional 
joking with alcohol involved.  I thought it was pretty funny.  However a 
year later and I realize that there appears to be a real problem with 
FreeBSD in the pgsql community.

There are other Linux centric dbs to pick from.  If pgsql is just 
another Linux centric DB then that is unfortunate but something I can 
deal with.

-Alfred