Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>,
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>,
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Palle Girgensohn <girgen@freebsd.org>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Francois Tigeot <ftigeot@wolfpond.org>
Date: 2014-04-21T16:38:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add shared_memory_type GUC.
- f1bebef60ec8 12.0 landed
On 04/21/2014 12:25 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > >>> >> >> 1. OS developers are not the target audience for GUCs. If the OS >> developers want to test and can't be botherrd with building with a >> couple of different parameters then I'm not very impressed. >> >> 2. We should be trying to get rid of GUCs where possible, and only >> add them when we must. The more there are the more we confuse users. >> If a packager can pick a default surely they can pick build options too. > Thank you for the lecture Andrew! Really pleasant way to treat a user > and a fan of the system. :) > > I confess to being mightily confused. cheers andrew