Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Palle Girgensohn <girgen@freebsd.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Francois Tigeot <ftigeot@wolfpond.org>
Date: 2014-04-21T16:38:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Add shared_memory_type GUC.

On 04/21/2014 12:25 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> 1. OS developers are not the target audience for GUCs. If the OS 
>> developers want to test and can't be botherrd with building with a 
>> couple of different parameters then I'm not very impressed.
>>
>> 2. We should be trying to get rid of GUCs where possible, and only 
>> add them when we must. The more there are the more we confuse users. 
>> If a packager can pick a default surely they can pick build options too.
> Thank you for the lecture Andrew!  Really pleasant way to treat a user 
> and a fan of the system. :)
>
>

I confess to being mightily confused.

cheers

andrew