Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes

Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>

From: Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>
To: Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert@amazon.com>, Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br>, teodor@sigaev.ru, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Date: 2023-11-21T11:31:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Make group_similar_or_args() reorder clause list as little as possible

  2. Allow usage of match_orclause_to_indexcol() for joins

  3. Skip not SOAP-supported indexes while transforming an OR clause into SAOP

  4. Remove the wrong assertion from match_orclause_to_indexcol()

  5. Teach bitmap path generation about transforming OR-clauses to SAOP's

  6. Transform OR-clauses to SAOP's during index matching

  7. Fix the value of or_to_any_transform_limit in postgresql.conf.sample

  8. Transform OR clauses to ANY expression

  9. MergeAttributes code deduplication

  10. SEARCH and CYCLE clauses

  11. Improve estimation of OR clauses using extended statistics.

  12. Teach btree to handle ScalarArrayOpExpr quals natively.

  13. Revise collation derivation method and expression-tree representation.

  14. Instead of trying to force WHERE clauses into CNF or DNF normal form,

Attachments

On 21.11.2023 03:50, Alena Rybakina wrote:
> On 20.11.2023 11:52, Andrei Lepikhov wrote:
>> Looking into the patch, I found some trivial improvements (see 
>> attachment).
>> Also, it is not obvious that using a string representation of the 
>> clause as a hash table key is needed here. Also, by making a copy of 
>> the node in the get_key_nconst_node(), you replace the location 
>> field, but in the case of complex expression, you don't do the same 
>> with other nodes.
>> I propose to generate expression hash instead + prove the equality of 
>> two expressions by calling equal().
>>
> I was thinking about your last email and a possible error where the 
> location field may not be cleared in complex expressions. 
> Unfortunately, I didn't come up with any examples either, but I think 
> I was able to handle this with a special function that removes 
> location-related patterns. The alternative to this is to bypass this 
> expression, but I think it will be more invasive. In addition, I have 
> added changes related to the hash table: now the key is of type int.
>
> All changes are displayed in the attached 
> v9-0001-Replace-OR-clause-to_ANY.diff.txt file.
>
> I haven't measured it yet. But what do you think about these changes?
>
>
Sorry, I lost your changes  during the revision process. I returned 
them. I raised the patch version just in case to run ci successfully.

-- 
Regards,
Alena Rybakina
Postgres Professional