Re: Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages?
Jim Nasby <jim.nasby@bluetreble.com>
From: Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-02-02T00:17:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2/1/17 3:36 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote: >> On 2/1/17 10:27 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >>> This looks fine to me. > This could go without the comments, they are likely going to be > forgotten if any updates happen in the future. I'm confused... I put the comments in there so if max shared buffers ever changed the other one would hopefully be updated as well. Speaking of which... I have a meeting in 15 minutes to discuss moving to a server with 4TB of memory. With current limits shared buffers maxes at 16TB, which isn't all that far in the future. While 16TB of shared buffers might not be a good idea, it's not going to be terribly long before we start getting questions about it. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
Commits
-
Increase upper bound for bgwriter_lru_maxpages.
- 14ca9abfbe46 10.0 landed