Re: Standalone synchronous master
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>
From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>
To: Rajeev rastogi <rajeev.rastogi@huawei.com>
Cc: Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>,
Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>, Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>,
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>,
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>,
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>,
MauMau <maumau307@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2014-01-24T20:47:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
ISTM the consensus is that we need better monitoring/administration interfaces so that people can script the behavior they want in external tools. Also, a new synchronous apply replication mode would be handy, but that'd be a whole different patch. We don't have a patch on the table that we could consider committing any time soon, so I'm going to mark this as rejected in the commitfest app. - Heikki