Re: Standalone synchronous master

Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>
To: Rajeev rastogi <rajeev.rastogi@huawei.com>
Cc: Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>, Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>, Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, MauMau <maumau307@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2014-01-24T20:47:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
ISTM the consensus is that we need better monitoring/administration 
interfaces so that people can script the behavior they want in external 
tools. Also, a new synchronous apply replication mode would be handy, 
but that'd be a whole different patch. We don't have a patch on the 
table that we could consider committing any time soon, so I'm going to 
mark this as rejected in the commitfest app.

- Heikki