Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: "Jonah H. Harris" <jharris@tvi.edu>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2005-01-13T04:54:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > My basic idea was to keep a status bit on each index entry telling it if > a previous backend looked at the heap and determined it was valid. Even if you could track the tuple's committed-good status reliably, that isn't enough under MVCC. The tuple might be committed good, and seen that way by some other backend that set the bit, and yet it's not supposed to be visible to your older transaction. Or the reverse at tuple deletion. regards, tom lane