Re: Truncation of object names
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2001-04-13T18:54:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers) writes: > Sorry, false alarm. When I got the test case, it turned out to > be the more familiar problem: > create table foo_..._bar1 (id1 ...); > [notice, "foo_..._bar1" truncated to "foo_..._bar"] > create table foo_..._bar (id2 ...); > [error, foo_..._bar already exists] > create index foo_..._bar_ix on foo_..._bar(id2); > [notice, "foo_..._bar_ix" truncated to "foo_..._bar"] > [error, foo_..._bar already exists] > [error, attribute "id2" not found] > It would be more helpful for the first "create" to fail so we don't > end up cluttered with objects that shouldn't exist, and which interfere > with operations on objects which should. Seems to me that if you want a bunch of CREATEs to be mutually dependent, then you wrap them all in a BEGIN/END block. regards, tom lane